Mystery Powder Lab


One of our big labs of the year is the Mystery Powder Lab.  I have 6 unknown white powders that the students have to identify by performing a series of chemical tests and observing physical properties. Once they have all their data collected, they use a flow chart to figure out the identity of each powder.

On a plastic tray, I set up the following equipment: one flask of vinegar, one flask of iodine, one flask of cabbage juice, 3 pipettes, cup of clean toothpicks, cup for used toothpicks, microwell plates, 6 numbered plastic knives, and a test tube clamp. I stress the importance of avoiding contamination and proper lab procedures.  When the bags are not in use, they should be closed and put back, never put anything back into the bags once its been used or touched any surfaces (besides the knives), to only use knife # 5 for powder #5, not to let the pipettes touch the powders they are testing, if anything spills or breaks to let me know, etc. The plastic trays help keep everything contained, the powders do get messy and some stuff will spill or overflow.  Very easy to clean up between classes when it’s all on the trays.

On the side of the classroom,  I have the 6 mystery powders in small zip-top bags, 4 of each one.  The powders are: baking soda, baking powder, flour, corn starch, sugar, and baby powder (no cornstarch kind). I have pre-cut aluminum foil squares for the heat test next to the bags, the students take one when they are ready to use it.  Under the hood, I have candles set up for the heat test.

Students can test the powders in any order, as long as their data is written next to the corresponding number on their data chart.  The tests that they perform are: Cabbage Juice to practice pH, vinegar to test for fizzing, and iodine to test for the presence of starch, and the heat test to test for sugar. For the heat test, you want a caramel color and bubbling for a positive test, all the other powders either scorch or don’t do much.

The students perform this lab in groups of 3-4 and it takes about 1 1/2 class periods to complete.  Once they have collected all their data and made their observations, I give them the flowchart to identify the powders.  As a group they evaluate their data and write down what they think each bag contains.  We go over the answers the next class period, or if everyone is done before the end of class, we go over the answers then. Kids really enjoy this lab and work well as a group.  They take turns doing the different tests and discuss what is happening during the lab.

Notebook:

  • pg. 118 – Mystery Powder Lab
  • pg. 119 – Flow Chart & Answers
  • Law of Conservation of Mass


    What I love about this lab: 

    • brush up on TBB skills
    • following directions skills
    • making observations
    • observing a chemical reaction
    • formation of a gas
    • mass of a gas
    • an endothermic reaction, bottom of flask gets pretty cold!
    • reading a chemical equation – shows that same elements are present before and after the reaction, no new elements are introduced or formed.
    • formation of new molecules, the atoms are rearranged to form new substances that were not in the flask before.

    The one thing that is not very clear to the kids is that the mass of the system before the reaction and after the reaction should be the same. Their results consistently show a loss of about 1 gram (on average) without releasing the gas from the balloon. When the gas was released, there was an additional loss of about 1 gram.  

    For this experiment, there are 2 factors that can make the final mass different. The first factor may be leakage: gas, liquid, or both escaped during the active part of the chemical reaction. The seal formed where the balloon meets the flask may not be 100% airtight, even with the kids holding it. But if leakage does not happen, the second factor is buoyancy. When the balloon fills up with CO2, the volume of the balloon increases, therefore displacing the air around it. NSTA published a study about this and had results to show that there was a relationship between the volume of the balloon and the decrease in mass for the closed system.

    Here is an excerpt from the published article: “Because the apparent loss of mass is not due to leakage, this relationship clearly demonstrates a buoyant effect. Archimedes’ principle states that any object submersed in a fluid will displace a volume of fluid equal to the volume of the object and the mass of the object will be reduced or “buoyed up” by an amount equal to the mass of the fluid displaced. Hence, when measuring the mass of an object in air (a fluid) on a balance, the mass that is measured is the conventional or apparent mass of the object. The true mass of the object would be the mass that would result if the object were massed in a vacuum.” (Science Scope, 2008)

    A better example to show conservation of mass may be to place an ice cube or two in a small plastic snack bag, and to take timed measurements as the ice cube melts. (In a humid classroom, condensation forming on the outside of the bag could alter results.) Also, if using baking soda and vinegar, using a soda bottle without the balloon and capping it would keep the volume the same.

    Overall, the kids enjoyed this experiment and it covered a lot of concepts that we studied. If you have done either of these experiments, please share your results!

    Notebook:

  • pg. 110 – Law of Conservation of Mass
  • pg. 111 – Conservation of Mass Analysis